Excerpts from a eulogy – Rob Hitchins
The late Nico Colchester, of The Economist and The Financial Times, once made the distinction between things that were soggy and things that were crunchy. He characterised sogginess as ‘comfortable uncertainty’: actions that are defined by compromise, half-truths, fence-sitting and face-saving. Crunchiness, on the other hand, leaves you in no doubt where you stand, for better or worse: actions that are defined by clarity, evidence, commitment and conviction. Alan Gibson was crunchy. He tried to do the right thing. He tried to make a difference.
Trawling through more than twenty years’ of memories and thinking about some of Alan’s defining attributes…
One of Alan’s distinctive attributes was his perseverance. His diligence and determination. Get the job done, to the highest standard, meet the deadline. ‘On, on’ was his mantra in the face of difficult circumstances, often with little regard for personal cost, comfort or self preservation. The easiest route isn’t necessarily the right one. On, on.
Another attribute, his intensity. Alan was a critical thinker, adept at dissecting a problem and bringing clarity and insight. He was innovative and always prepared to challenge convention.
Finally, the attribute most often associated with Alan is bravery. Fearlessness. Jim Tanburn recalled that Alan bet the firm on challenging the status quo. This got me thinking. Was Alan really that brave? Tenacious, yes. Direct, certainly. Prepared to confront uncomfortable truths, unquestionably. But does that count as brave? It hardly puts him or anyone who works in international development in the same category of courage as a combat soldier or a firefighter. In our work, doing the right thing shouldn’t require bravery. If the status quo isn’t working for millions of disadvantaged people then the status quo needs to be challenged. That was Alan’s job. That’s our job. We don’t praise a surgeon for not being squeamish. It’s a prerequisite. When convention isn’t working it is incumbent on us to try something different. If the medical profession hadn’t challenged convention and tried that new-fangled penicillin stuff, we might still be using leeches.
Our profession owes Alan a debt of gratitude. The Springfield team will miss him. Immeasurably. He was a colleague, a mentor and a friend. But let’s not mourn his tragic loss. Let’s honour and embrace his legacy. Let’s go out and redouble our efforts to do the right thing. Let’s be crunchy.